The Childhood Vaccine Placebo Myth
Unraveling the deception by omission
This topic is a lightening rod that has the rare ability to send otherwise rational people into childish, foot stomping denials. It is one of those things that causes so much cognitive dissonance in people that it can actually ruin relationships. Objectively looking at the responses I have gotten from people who disagree on this issue, I can understand why they would act in that way. There are a lot of psychological parallels to the way people react to COVID vaccine critics. It boils down to personal responsibility and the inability of most people to accept that they may have made a terrible decision for themselves and their families. No one wants to admit they put people they love in harm’s way.
In fact the urge to fight that feeling tends to override rationality, instantly sending a person into a state of denial and anger that is directed at the perceived heretic. These psychological defense mechanisms that have been known for decades have in a sense been weaponized against us. Governments and corporations rely upon it to build consensus within the population and create a cultural environment that marginalizes dissent and as they become more and more desperate to control what people think.
As the Information Age progresses we now see signs that they are seriously trying to criminalize dissent, labeling anyone who speaks out of line a “disinformation agent” or a myriad of other pejoratives meant to discredit people. This is why I believe articles such as this are more important than ever and individuals who may not be writers or journalists by trade need to speak up if a free world is an ideal to which they aspire. We must stop waiting on traditional media to tell us the truth because as recent years have shown us, we will all be dead by the time that happens. As much as I am sorry to inform you of this, the media, major corporations and the government have become indistinguishable from one another. In other words and by definition we are living in a Neo-Fascist state that continues to consolidate power and claim dominion over “the truth”.
The evidence of this is legion, everywhere you look there are signs that this is happening. The revolving door in the pharmaceutical industry, where an FDA official plays ball with a company for a few years to get a drug approved and as soon as they leave that role they are hired as an executive or consultant making ten times as much money per year. Only a fool would close their eyes to the fact that this is clearly influence peddling. More recently this has been happening in the media, where we routinely see intelligence agency officials retire their post only to be hired by MSNBC or CNN. Can what these individuals tell the country on a nightly basis seriously be trusted as “fair and balanced”? Apparently the media executives who gave these hires the green light think very little of their viewerships ability to discern the truth from fiction.
This is the key point, the elites in society believe you and I to be malleable bottom feeders who will take every absurd dictate about reality at face value. The sad part is, that for a certain percentage of people, they are correct. With that I hope you will share the information contained in this article with those friends and family members who fall in that percentage because all it takes is a sliver of sunlight to expose darkness and perhaps one day that sliver can turn into a blazing beam that engulfs the darkness that has overtaken so many minds.
When you hear the word placebo what comes to mind? Most people will conjure an image of a harmless sugar pill or saline solution designed to be indistinguishable from the particular substance that is being tested for efficacy. It is a baseline concept in scientific research, in order to truly understand how a drug or vaccine works, we must be able to compare the results against a control that hasn’t received said drug or vaccine. When I ask someone about this, to a man and woman that is the type of response I get. Almost everyone understands the importance of a placebo in drug research but at the same time almost everyone assumes the placebo’s being used are inert and harmless, only there to act as a comparative baseline. This belief is pervasive, even amongst people who work it bio-medical industries and it is this perception that is banked upon by vaccine manufacturers and government agencies in order to gain pubic acceptance of more and more vaccines added to the childhood schedule.
In 1963 the lifetime amount of vaccines children were given was 5 total does of 3 vaccines, OPV, Smallpox and DTP and by 1983 the total amount of doses and vaccines had grown considerably to 24 totals doses. Then in 1986 due to pressure from pharmaceutical companies because they were getting sued so often because of their products were inquiring people, the Reagan administration pushed through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. This abomination made it so manufacturers could not be sued for injuries or death caused by their products. Subsequently the amount of doses recommended by the CDC for children went from 24 doses to 72 total doses and the American taxpayers has paid out more than $4 Billion in vaccine injury compensation. Yet America has some of the sickest children on earth in 2023, beset with obesity, diabetes, and numerous autoimmune diseases.
If vaccines are so safe and effective, so much so that America gives its children more vaccines than almost any other country, why then are our kids the sickest and vaccine manufacturers afforded blanket legal liability? The obvious answer is, they are neither safe or effective and in fact the childhood vaccines everyone gives to their own children haven’t been tested properly for safety. As unbelievable as this may seem, it is true and this takes us back to the aforementioned psychology of perception management. On it’s face the statement that none of the childhood vaccines have been properly tested for safety does sound insane and when you understand how they do this, it is insane.
In the following I am going to go through each vaccine on the CDC’s childhood schedule and provide evidence for each one that shows not one vaccine has been tested using an inert saline solution as a placebo. All of the evidence I provide is either directly from the manufacturers insert or a phase 3 clinical study that was used as the basis for the vaccines approval. I’ll provide a direct link to these documents so the incredulous can verify this claim for themselves. Ask yourself this, why would a vaccine manufacturer used a bio-active “placebo” i.e. something that will cause a biological reaction as a control against their vaccine?
I have posed this question to people and receive out right denials that this is the case or convoluted explanations that invariably remain biased in favor of the manufacturer and ambivalent to the safety of the children being experimented on. Make no mistake about it, they are using bio-active placebo’s and often times they are simply other vaccines that were never tested against a saline placebo in the first place, in order to obscure the safety signal. If the “placebo” is known to cause a reaction like a rash, fatigue or a headache when compared to a rash, fatigue or headache the vaccine seeking approval causes, the safety signal can be plausibly denied. On the other hand if a saline solution was used and also is a much cheaper option I might add, which is known to cause very little biological reactions in most people, then the safety signal comes across as much more pronounced, making it harder to be ignored by regulators.
This isn’t even taking into account the fact that these studies are conducted entirely by the pharmaceutical company who can withhold data if it chooses to do so in the final report submitted for approval, something that is standard operating procedure in the industry. The government regulators are relying on the pharmaceutical company to act in a moral and ethical manner in order to get their drug approved. A drug that if not approved will have cost the company millions if not billions in research and development. So the government in placing sole discretion on what efficacy and safety data to submit, to an industry that has racked up more fines for impropriety than any other in history, repeatedly breaking the law. It is this level of willful naïveté and collusion between the government and industry that needs to be completely reformed if we are to have any hope for health and prosperity in the future while this malignant scourge on society continues to metastasize unabated.
As I go through the reality about the lack of true safety studies conducted on vaccines given to millions of children a year, ask yourself again, why aren’t they using true saline placebo’s when studying these them if they are truly interested in understanding the safety profiles?
Brand Name: Kinrix
Used For: (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis-Polio)
In the only trial specifically described in the package insert the control group received the Infanrix and polio vaccines. The package insert doesn’t mention any trial involving a placebo control group.
Brand Name: Infanrix
Used For: (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis)
Tested against a control group that received the DTP vaccine or no control group.
Brand Name: DTP
(Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis)
The vaccine was developed in the 1930s and has never been tested in an RCT against a control group receiving a real placebo.
Brand Name: Pentacel
(Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis-Polio-Hib)
The control groups in 3 of the 4 trials received an assortment of different vaccines. The 4th trial's control group may have received no vaccines; however, its safety data is not presented in the package insert.
Pentacel FDA Clinical Safety Review
Brand Name: Quadracel
(Diphtheria-tetanus)
Brand Name: Prevnar
Pneumococcal disease
Tested against a control group that received an experimental meningococcal vaccine.
Brand Name: Prevnar-13
Pneumococcal disease
Tested against a control group receiving Prevnar (older-generation vaccine)
Brand Name: Engerix
(Hepatitis B)
Its side effect rate was compared to that of a previous generation product (plasma vaccine).
Brand Name: Twinrix
(Hepatitis A and B)
Tested in clinical trials against a control group that received separate hepatitis A and B vaccines.
Brand Name: Recombivax HB
(Hepatitis B Recombinant)
The package insert does not mention any safety RCT performed in infants.
Brand Name: Havrix
(Hepatitis A)
The control group in the main trial received the hepatitis B vaccine. In three other trials, the control group received several other vaccines (MMR, varicella vaccine, and more).
Brand Name: Vaqta
(Hepatitis A)
In one trial, there was no control group (according to another document, the control group received a compound that included aluminum and thimerosal), and in the second trial the vaccine was given concurrently with other vaccines and without a control group.
Brand Name: ProQuad
(Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella)
Safety was tested in several randomized clinical trials, most of which were not blinded. None of the trials contained a control group receiving only a placebo.
Brand Name: MMR II
(Measles, Mumps, Rubella)
Tested in eight small unblinded clinical trials. All of the trials had one or more control groups receiving either the predecessor MMR vaccine, a measles-rubella (MR) vaccine, or a single-dose of the rubella vaccine.
MMR II FOIA Showing Lack of Placebo
Brand Name: MMR
(Measles, Mumps, Rubella)
Tested in several small to medium unblinded and partially randomized trials. The control groups totaled about 1/10 the number of subjects in the trial groups and received no injection.
237 Page MMR Clinical Trial Report
Brand Name: Varivax
(Varicella)
In one RCT the "placebo" given to the control group was actually the test vaccine from which the viral component was removed. Another trial compared two different formulations of the vaccine.
Study Describing Use of “placebo” with viral component removed.
Brand Name: RotaTeq
(Rotovirus)
The control group in the trial probably received the vaccine-sans-antigen compound but the description of the control compound cannot be found in the FDA licensing documents. So we do not know for sure which is highly suspicious.
RotaTeq Efficacy & Safety Review
Brand Name: Rotarix
(Rotavirus)
The control group in the trial received the vaccine-sans-antigen compound.
I’ve endeavored to make this as easy as possible for you, I’ve provided links as well as screen shots so you don’t have to dig through inserts and reports. Everything I have provided has either been directly sourced from the government or straight from the manufacturer insert. I’d like you to go back to our question, why would the FDA allow “vaccines” that will be injected in almost every child in America be approved without using a proper insert saline placebo and how can the truly know the safety profile since they haven’t?
Furthermore, why would they allow the manufacturers to have blanket liability protections on top that? What other industry in the world is protected from harms its products cause plus handed a captive perpetual mandated market in perpetuity? We are injecting these vaccines into new born babies, the most vulnerable among us without second thought and if anyone points to a vaccine as the culprit for an injury, doctors, media, friends and family members have been culturally trained to immediately deny it.
This psychological magic trick is perhaps one of the most pernicious ever perpetrated on the public. It is the result of incessant propaganda messaging from cradle to grave. People just cannot reconcile the fact that they have been continually lied to and they have unquestionably believed the lies their entire life. The ego simply will not allow doubt to creep in despite evidence of the lies all around them daily. I hope in some small part this article can serve as a bridge to those in your life that have been programmed to trust liars and see their loved ones as “conspiracy theorists” or “extremists” for critically thinking. They may dismiss you at first but challenge them to prove this information wrong. Find one phase 3 clinical trial or manufacturer insert used as the basis for the approval of a childhood schedule vaccine, that used an inert saline placebo to test for safety. Again, I’ve only provided what the FDA used for approval and what the manufacturers submitted, this isn’t my opinion or conjecture, it’s reality. If they do not care that children are essentially being experimented on, well that is between them and their maker.
Thanks for taking the time to document all of this. I have read about this lack of true placebo. Unfortunately only years after willingly injecting our young person.
Never again on my watch.