The senators questioning Kennedy appeared to be ignorant and intolerant, clinging to their narrative that vaccines are proven safe and effective. Cognitive dissonance abounds as you point out, and they apparently are choosing to to ignore and discount whatever doesn't fit their limited and profit-fueled narrative. I've seen this type of behaviour before, in children, and adults, when they get caught lying, or stealing. Other observers can see this but they themselves can't, as it would open up a world of contradiction and maybe personal loss.
The vaccine paradigm is about to crash after decades of deceit and layer upon layer of corruption. The truth can't be stopped or twisted much longer because we're on the precipice and our survival as a species is threatened by this.
The safety debate is moot. We should be having a science debate on vaccinology and virology. The government is hawking products that are not only harmful, but are USELESS.
I agree they churn out essentially useless and dangerous products but I disagree that the safety debate is moot. I firmly believe that if there was an independent moratorium with all the other points I recommend in the article, that they would find so much fuckery that the products would be forced off the market and liability protection rescinded.
Now I am also a realist and understand that the forces lined up against these measures would be an enormous roadblock to overcome. Even if an independent commission was set up it would be hard to trust because of the entrenched interests and ideologies.
When good people around the World work for the Love of Humanity and Life Itself, many Problems can be Solved, many Cures can be Found, it only takes Good People, then Justice can be Served. God Bless Robert F Kennedy Jr.
There must be a reason, one personally can't base an opinion on conjecture, that is, it has been done, was it for profit, or is there another explanation ? We know many have made profit from the depopulation agenda, since the injections were not fit for purpose, should all the profits be returned back to government, to be used in a new Health System which works on cures rather than experimental drugs, which do not comply with the Nuremberg Code 1947, should all the companies who did or do not comply with the Nuremberg Code 1947 be brought to trial ? When given the chance for change, which type of company would one choose to invest in? One has to question, whether AI has been used as a political tool, the Electoral Registers are part of the Voting System, in the U.K. the Secret Ballot Act 1872 was set up , for people to have a Secret Ballot, there vote on an Issued Ballot Paper was made in Secret, and placed in the Locked and Sealed Ballot Box, which was used, instead of a show of hands which if you voted for the opposition, a family could lose their home and their jobs. One therefore has to question, who is in Control of the Voting Systems, have they been infiltrated by an outside source, could there be political influence? Medical Records which should be confidential between a doctor and patient, many Medical Records have been sold off, who were they sold off to, is there any political influence attached to those who bought Medical Records, is there an outside source? When one receives a letter from the NHS which states, " Your Injections," one has to question whether a specific identifiable injection has been placed against one's name? When did the changes start, Who implemented them, What happened, was there any Political Influence, What is a Depopulation Agenda, Who did it affect, What effects did it cause? Who is banning certain medications which are tried and tested ? One is not totally opposed to AI, if it is kept safe and secure, however in the wrong hands, could it wipe out civilisations ?
The senators questioning Kennedy appeared to be ignorant and intolerant, clinging to their narrative that vaccines are proven safe and effective. Cognitive dissonance abounds as you point out, and they apparently are choosing to to ignore and discount whatever doesn't fit their limited and profit-fueled narrative. I've seen this type of behaviour before, in children, and adults, when they get caught lying, or stealing. Other observers can see this but they themselves can't, as it would open up a world of contradiction and maybe personal loss.
The vaccine paradigm is about to crash after decades of deceit and layer upon layer of corruption. The truth can't be stopped or twisted much longer because we're on the precipice and our survival as a species is threatened by this.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/24/robert-f-kennedy-jr-rfk-crispr-stock-gene-editing-mrna/
Spot on! So many people are unaware of the dangers of vaccines and they all need to read this. Thank you for highlighting it.
The safety debate is moot. We should be having a science debate on vaccinology and virology. The government is hawking products that are not only harmful, but are USELESS.
I agree they churn out essentially useless and dangerous products but I disagree that the safety debate is moot. I firmly believe that if there was an independent moratorium with all the other points I recommend in the article, that they would find so much fuckery that the products would be forced off the market and liability protection rescinded.
Now I am also a realist and understand that the forces lined up against these measures would be an enormous roadblock to overcome. Even if an independent commission was set up it would be hard to trust because of the entrenched interests and ideologies.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/24/robert-f-kennedy-jr-rfk-crispr-stock-gene-editing-mrna/
When good people around the World work for the Love of Humanity and Life Itself, many Problems can be Solved, many Cures can be Found, it only takes Good People, then Justice can be Served. God Bless Robert F Kennedy Jr.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/24/robert-f-kennedy-jr-rfk-crispr-stock-gene-editing-mrna/
There must be a reason, one personally can't base an opinion on conjecture, that is, it has been done, was it for profit, or is there another explanation ? We know many have made profit from the depopulation agenda, since the injections were not fit for purpose, should all the profits be returned back to government, to be used in a new Health System which works on cures rather than experimental drugs, which do not comply with the Nuremberg Code 1947, should all the companies who did or do not comply with the Nuremberg Code 1947 be brought to trial ? When given the chance for change, which type of company would one choose to invest in? One has to question, whether AI has been used as a political tool, the Electoral Registers are part of the Voting System, in the U.K. the Secret Ballot Act 1872 was set up , for people to have a Secret Ballot, there vote on an Issued Ballot Paper was made in Secret, and placed in the Locked and Sealed Ballot Box, which was used, instead of a show of hands which if you voted for the opposition, a family could lose their home and their jobs. One therefore has to question, who is in Control of the Voting Systems, have they been infiltrated by an outside source, could there be political influence? Medical Records which should be confidential between a doctor and patient, many Medical Records have been sold off, who were they sold off to, is there any political influence attached to those who bought Medical Records, is there an outside source? When one receives a letter from the NHS which states, " Your Injections," one has to question whether a specific identifiable injection has been placed against one's name? When did the changes start, Who implemented them, What happened, was there any Political Influence, What is a Depopulation Agenda, Who did it affect, What effects did it cause? Who is banning certain medications which are tried and tested ? One is not totally opposed to AI, if it is kept safe and secure, however in the wrong hands, could it wipe out civilisations ?