3 Comments
Jan 30·edited Jan 30

WHY didn't the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) conduct a risk assessment on fluoride safety? What was the NFS reasoning for ignoring this issue and not establishing hard data for a decision?

Fluoride is afterall an industrial waste by-product.

What other industrial waste by-products does the NSF ignore in regards to public health and environmental cleanliness?

Expand full comment
Jan 19Liked by Josh Walkos

Swallowing doesn’t even matter! The absorption into our bloodstream’s from sublingual placement is much more direct & lethal!

“When a chemical comes in contact with the mucous membrane beneath the tongue, it is absorbed. Because the connective tissue beneath the epithelium contains a profusion of capillaries, the substance then diffuses into them and enters the venous circulation.[1] In contrast, substances absorbed in the intestines are subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver before entering the general circulation.”

Expand full comment
Jan 18Liked by Josh Walkos

Brilliant to see, finally.😊

It's taken x many decades to get them to admit that publically, so getting them to admit that they have also allowed nanopollutants, nanoparticulates and nanotechnology exposure to the public for 70+ years, should only take another 70+ years, unless a court orders them to.

#dontaskwonttell #monetisedgarbage #ixnaypoisonay #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised

Expand full comment